Most parameter constraints obtained from cosmic microwave background (CMB)
anisotropy data are based on power estimates and rely on approximate likeli
hood functions; computational difficulties generally preclude an exact anal
ysis based on pixel values. With the specific goal of testing this kind of
approach, we have performed a complete (un-approximated) likelihood analysi
s combining the COBE, Saskatoon and MAX data sets. We examine in detail the
ability of certain approximate techniques based on band-power estimates to
recover the full likelihood constraints. The traditional chi (2)-method do
es not always find the same best-fit model as the likelihood analysis (a bi
as), due mainly to the false assumption of Gaussian likelihoods that makes
the method overly sensitive to data outliers. Although an improvement, othe
r approaches employing non-Gaussian flat-band likelihoods do not always fai
thfully reproduce the complete likelihood constraints either; not even when
using the exact flat-band likelihood curves. We trace this to the neglect
of spectral information by simple flat band-power estimates. A straightforw
ard extension incorporating a local effective slope (of the power spectrum,
C-l) provides a faithful representation of the likelihood surfaces without
significantly increasing computing cost. Finally, we also demonstrate that
the best-fit model to this particular data set is a good Ft, or that the o
bservations are consistent with Gaussian sky fluctuations, according to our
statistics.