Adult learning principles embodied in the paired-paddock model

Citation
Jp. Trompf et Pwg. Sale, Adult learning principles embodied in the paired-paddock model, AUST J EX A, 41(2), 2001, pp. 195-204
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture/Agronomy
Journal title
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE
ISSN journal
08161089 → ACNP
Volume
41
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
195 - 204
Database
ISI
SICI code
0816-1089(2001)41:2<195:ALPEIT>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
A checklist was developed to determine the extent to which different adult learning principles were embodied in the paired-paddock model used in the T riple P Program. A total of 181 producers that were involved in the Triple P Program between 1997 and 1999 completed the checklist at the end of the p rogram. This enabled the relative strengths and weaknesses of the paired-pa ddock model from an adult learning perspective to be identified. The 15 adult learning principles assessed in the checklist were all operati ng in the paired-paddock model to varying degrees. The adult learning princ iples relating to the learning environment and learning process received th e highest ratings from producers. In addition, the ratings given for these adult learning experiences were significantly correlated with the change in dex, a measure of the degree of on-farm adoption of productive pastures by the program participants. The principles relating to the learning environme nt were the existence of a comfortable learning environment, which allowed effective 2-way communication enabling participants to learn from each othe r. Principles relating to the learning process were the active participatio n of producers in activities, the use of knowledge and experience within th e group, and the provision of opportunity for reinforcement of information and practice of skills. The relative weaknesses identified in the paired-paddock model from an adul t learning perspective were the degree of self-directed learning done by pa rticipants, the limited involvement of participants in planning their learn ing experience, and the limited extent to which the program related to prob lem issues among the group. Despite these relative weaknesses it was conclu ded that the paired-paddock model embodies sound adult learning principles that assist in the delivery of quality learning outcomes for participants.