Objective To retrospectively review 5 years' experience of transperitoneal
laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) in infants and children.
Patients and methods Between January 1995 and December 1999, 14 upper-pole
partial nephrectomies (seven right and seven left) were undertaken in 13 ch
ildren (mean age 3.8 years, range 0.4-14). One patient underwent bilateral
upper-pole LPN. No children required a lower-pole partial nephrectomy durin
g the study period. Evaluation included renal ultrasonography. voiding cyst
ourethrography. renal scintigraphy and contrast-enhanced computed tomograph
y in some cases. Three ports (10, 5 and 5 mm) were used in all except two p
atients, who required an additional 2 mm port for liver retraction. The dis
eased parenchyma was transected with electrocautery or harmonic scalpel. Th
e distal ureter was simply transected in the absence of reflux, but tied ad
jacent to the bladder if reflux was present.
Results The mean operative duration for LPN was 100 min, with an estimated
blood loss of < 30 mL. A liquid diet was tolerated on the first morning aft
er surgery and age-appropriate regular diet that evening in all except one
patient. The mean hospital stay was 2.6 days. One patient bad a significant
decrease in haematocrit, which was managed conservatively, not requiring t
ransfusion. Follow-up telephone interviews with the patients' parents showe
d that all were satisfied with the medical and cosmetic outcome.
Conclusion Transperitoneal LPN is preferable to open partial nephrectomy be
cause: (i) The magnification provided by laparoscopy provides excellent vis
ion for the precise dissection of the parenchyma and distal ureter, avoidin
g injury to the healthy tissue: (ii) There is minimal blood loss, fast reco
very and less surgical scarring, and when upper-pole partial nephrectomy is
required. LPN is less damaging to the lower-pole. Unlike total nephrectomy
, where debate remains about open vs laparoscopic methods, the specific adv
antages of LPN make it clearly preferable.