G. Manning et al., Role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the assessment and prognosis of patients with borderline hypertension, BLOOD PRESS, 10(1), 2001, pp. 33-36
The role of ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring in the assessment of
mild/borderline hypertension (BHT) is unclear. The aim of this study was t
o test the hypothesis that measurement of ABP in borderline hypertensives d
ifferentiates patients with true mild hypertension from those with isolated
clinic hypertension (raised office BP but normal ABP) and that a raised AB
P identifies a subgroup who are more likely to progress to and require trea
tment over 1 year. Consecutive untreated patients with BHT (n = 127, 44 +/-
13 years, 45% male) were divided into two groups according to awake ABP: G
roup 1 (normal ABP less than or equal to 136/86, n = 48), and Group 2 (abno
rmal ABP > 136/86, n = 79). Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was greater
(116 +/- 30 vs 101 +/- 25g/m(2), p < 0.01) and the proportion of patients w
ith an increased LVMI was significantly higher (34% vs 17%, p = 0.05) in Gr
oup 2. During 1 year of follow-up, significantly more patients in Group 2 (
34%) required antihypertensive treatment compared with Group 1 (8%, p = 0.0
1). ABP monitoring usefully discriminates between patients with true BHT an
d those with isolated clinic hypertension. An elevated awake ABP on initial
assessment is associated with a higher LVMI and a greater likelihood of pr
ogression to moderate hypertension requiring pharmacological treatment.