Introduction The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is now an
accepted tool in the assessment of clinical skills in dentistry. 'There ar
e however no strict or limiting guidelines on the types of scenario that ar
e used in the OSCE examinations and experience and experimentation will ine
vitably result in the refinement of the OSCE as a tool for assessment.
Aim The aim of this study was to compare and contrast different types of cl
inical operative skills scenarios in multi-station OSCE examinations.
Methodology Student feedback was obtained immediately after the sitting of
an OSCE examination on two different occasions land two different cohorts o
f students). The same questionnaire was used to elicit the responses.
Results The questionnaire feedback was analysed qualitatively with particul
ar regard to student perception of the usefulness and validity of the two d
ifferent kinds of OSCE scenarios.
Conclusions OSCE scenarios which involve phantom heads are perceived to lac
k clinical authenticity, and are inappropriate for the assessment of certai
n clinical operative skills. While the OSCE is useful in the examination of
diagnostic, interpretation and treatment planning skills, it has apparent
limitations in the examination of invasive operative procedures.