Hepatitis B vaccines: Assessment of the seroprotective efficacy of two recombinant DNA vaccines

Citation
T. Coates et al., Hepatitis B vaccines: Assessment of the seroprotective efficacy of two recombinant DNA vaccines, CLIN THER, 23(3), 2001, pp. 392-403
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology
Journal title
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS
ISSN journal
01492918 → ACNP
Volume
23
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
392 - 403
Database
ISI
SICI code
0149-2918(200103)23:3<392:HBVAOT>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Background: In universal vaccination programs, when there is no postvaccina tion serologic assessment of response, there must be confidence that the va ccines used provide a high degree of seroprotection. Objective: This parallel analysis of 2 recombinant hepatitis B vaccines (En gerix B (R) and Recombivax (R) /HB-Vax II (R)) was conducted to review the seroprotective efficacy of each vaccine in defined populations. Methods: Clinical studies of the 2 vaccines published as manuscripts or con ference abstracts in the public domain between January 1986 and April 1999 were identified retrospectively by unrestricted screening of journals throu gh BIOSIS (R), MEDLINE (R), and EMBASE (R) and the Internet. Unpublished or internal company data were excluded to maintain impartiality. The studies were reviewed and analyzed. The studies were not assessed for quality other than a judgment of their eligibility for inclusion in the analysis. The pr imary outcome measure was the proportion of subjects in defined populations who showed an early seroprotective response to currently licensed vaccinat ion schedules. Summary statistical analyses of seroprotective response rate s and 95% CIs were calculated for each vaccine for each population. Seropro tective response was defined by an anti-hepatitis B surface antigen titer g reater than or equal to 10 IU/L measured between I and 3 months after the f inal vaccination. Because the study was designed specifically to review pub lished immunogenicity data, safety data were not assessed. The study was no t designed to demonstrate superiority of one vaccine over the other. Results: A total of 181 clinical studies representing 32,904 vaccinated sub jects were reviewed and analyzed, of whom 24,277 had been vaccinated with E ngerix B and 8627 vaccinated with Recombivax/ MB-Var II. Seroprotection was achieved in 20,060 subjects (95.8%) with Engerix B and in 7774 subjects (9 4.3%) with Recombivax/HB-Vax II in the normal population vaccinated accordi ng to currently licensed 3-dose schedules. In a subgroup analysis, response rates in health care workers were 6492 subjects (94.5%) for Engerix B and 3245 subjects (92.2%) for Recombivax/HB-Vax II. Children and adolescents(1- 19 years) showed the highest response rates to vaccination (4612 [98.6%], E ngerix B: 2292 [98.9%], Recombivax/HB-Vax II). A total of 2875 infants (<1 year) (95.8%) achieved seroprotection with Engerix B. 701 (88.5%) achieved seroprotection with Recombivax/ MB-Var II. Conclusions: Hepatitis B vaccination programs using either Engerix B or Rec ombivax/HB-Vax II can achieve high seroprotective response rates, particula rly in childhood and adolescence. Ideally, younger populations should be a primary target in current universal vaccination programs.