Improving time-to-market using SDL tools and techniques

Citation
Nn. Mansurov et Rl. Probert, Improving time-to-market using SDL tools and techniques, COMPUT NET, 35(6), 2001, pp. 667-691
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Information Tecnology & Communication Systems
Journal title
COMPUTER NETWORKS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKING
ISSN journal
13891286 → ACNP
Volume
35
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
667 - 691
Database
ISI
SICI code
1389-1286(200105)35:6<667:ITUSTA>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
In this paper we summarize our experiences in building and integrating new generation, formal-methods based computer aided software engineering tools (CASE) to yield pragmatic improvements in software engineering processes in the telecommunication industry. We define an accelerated development metho dology (ADM) for the specification, design, testing and re-engineering of t elecommunications software. We identify two of the most significant barrier s to adoption of tools and formal methods to speed up software development, namely the requirements engineering barrier and the legacy code re-enginee ring barrier, and show how the ADM methodology helps to overcome these barr iers and improve time-to-market for telecommunications software. Our ADM methodology is based on the most widely accepted formal languages s tandardized by the International Telecommunications Union (ITU): (i) a scenario description language called Message Sequence Chorus (MSC), (ii) an EFSM-based Specification and Description Language (SDL), (iii) an executable test description language called Tree and Tabular Combi ned Notation (TTCN), (iv) a data description language Abstract Syntax Notation (ASN.1), This paper emphasizes the following key components of our ADM methodology a nd their placement within the most common software engineering processes: (i) Use-Case Based High-Yield Requirements Engineering with MSCs, (ii) Synthesis of SDL requirements models (SRM) from approved MSC scenarios . (iii) Efficient, concurrent generation of high-yield TTCN test cases. (iv) Seamless refinement of SRM into SDL design models. (v) Code generation from the SDL models. (vi) Automated re-engineering of SDL models from legacy software.