Hm. El-gamal et al., Electrosurgery, pacemakers and ICDs: A survey of precautions and complications experienced by cutaneous surgeons, DERM SURG, 27(4), 2001, pp. 385-390
BACKGROUND. Minimal information is available in the literature regarding th
e precautions implemented or complications experienced by cutaneous surgeon
s when electrosurgery is used in patients with pacemakers or implantable ca
rdioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), The literature pertinent to dermatologist
s is primarily based on experiences of other surgical specialties and a gen
erally recommended thorough perioperative evaluation.
OBJECTIVE. TO determine what precautions are currently taken by cutaneous s
urgeons in patients with pacemakers or ICDs, and what types of complication
s have occurred due to electrosurgery in a dermatologic setting.
METHODS. In the winter of 2000, a survey was mailed to 419 U.S.-based membe
rs of the American College of Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Cutaneous Oncol
ogy (ACMMSCO).
RESULTS. A total of 166 (40%) surveys were returned. Routine precautions in
cluded utilizing short bursts of less than 5 seconds (71%), use of minimal
power (61%), and avoiding use around the pacemaker or ICD (57%). The types
of interference reported were skipped beats (eight patients), reprogramming
of a pacemaker (six patients), firing of an ICD (four patients), asystole
(three patients), bradycardia (two patients), depleted battery life of a pa
cemaker tone patient), and an unspecified tachyarrhythmia tone patient). Ov
erall there was a low rate of complications (0.8 cases/100 years of surgica
l practice), with no reported significant morbidity or mortality. Bipolar f
orceps were utilized by 19% of respondents and were not associated with any
incidences of interference.
CONCLUSIONS. Significant interference to pacemakers or ICDs rarely results
from office-based electrosurgery. No clear community practice standards reg
arding precautions was evident from this survey. The use of bipolar forceps
or true electrocautery are the better options when electrosurgey is requir
ed. These two modalities may necessitate fewer perioperative precautions th
an generally recommended, without compromising patient safety.