Population-based survey of childhood disability in Eastern Jeddah using the ten questions tool

Citation
Wa. Milaat et al., Population-based survey of childhood disability in Eastern Jeddah using the ten questions tool, DISABIL REH, 23(5), 2001, pp. 199-203
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Rehabilitation
Journal title
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
ISSN journal
09638288 → ACNP
Volume
23
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
199 - 203
Database
ISI
SICI code
0963-8288(200103)23:5<199:PSOCDI>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Purpose : To identify the prevalence of handicapping disabilities among chi ldren up to 15 years of age and their epidemiological pattern in the easter n part of Jeddah. Methods : In a population-based cross-sectional household survey in the eas tern Jeddah area, Saudi Arabia, a multistage sampling method was applied to screen children in 875 houses using the ten questions survey tool for iden tification of disabilities. Further information collected for detected disa bilities included possible risk factors, cause of the disability as perceiv ed by the family and services previously provided to the child. Results : A total of 137 cases of disability were detected giving a point p revalence rate of 36.7 per 1000 children. Twenty-nine children (21.2%) were discovered for the first time during the survey. The majority of cases wer e male (57.7%) and the mean age for all cases was 10 years (SD = 5.5) with no case detected under one year of age. Disabled children were in the fourt h or fifth birth order among their brothers and sisters and 47 (34%) of the m were recorded as a second or third disability in the same family. Number of disabilities in the same child varied widely : 59% of cases had a single disability, 22% had two conditions and 19% had three or more conditions. S peech, motor and mental disabilities ranked top of the disabilities detecte d by the ten-question tool. The commonest cause of these disabilities as pe rceived by the family was hereditary diseases followed by childhood illness es. Significant risk factors associated to these conditions included larger number of children in the family, older age of either parent, histories of handicapping conditions in the original families of either of the parents and presence of handicapping condition in the mothers. Families reported la ck of services provided to their disabled children in the community. Conclusions : The survey tool managed to document, successfully, a prevalen ce rate of childhood disabilities in the community with a general picture o f their types and suspected causes which is quite comparable to that found in Saudi Arabia. It also reported a low service delivery for these disabili ties and identified some risk factors related to their occurrence. It is re commended to apply this survey method with certain modifications to suit th e local culture in Saudi Arabia. Improvement of the services rendered to ha ndicapped children in Jeddah is also recommended.