As in other Western countries, a wave of reform has swept the Danish public
sector. The record of these reforms is mixed and paradoxical; an ambiguous
delegation of executive authority and radical privatization have been succ
essfully implemented, while other measures, especially contracting out and
user democracy or the introduction of greater choice, turn out to have fail
ed. The paper argues that this experience offers two general lessons. First
, short-term costs and benefits are decisive to those who enact and impleme
nt public sector reform. Second, institutional factors specific to each typ
e of reorganization have a major impact on the political distribution of co
sts and benefits.