Within the crossed categorization paradigm we examined the consequences of
cooperative and personalized contact under conditions that promoted attenti
on to unique attributes of team members (decategorization) versus condition
s that emphasized their category memberships. As predicted, when the rule f
or composing teams emphasized one or both of the experimentally induced dim
ensions of category distinction, ethnocentric bias generalized to members o
f another team as a function of category similarity. When, instead, the rul
e emphasized team members' unique attributes, shared ingroup memberships no
longer moderated bias towards members of another team Instead, there was a
n equivalence pattern in the evaluative ratings of the four targets (in-gro
up/in-group; in-group/out-group; out-group/in-group; out-group/out-group) o
f the crossed categorization paradigm. Copyright (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons
, Ltd.