The purpose of this study was to report 30 cases of missed lung cancers and
describe characteristics of each case. Reasons for misdiagnosis were analy
zed from the report. Each radiograph was subsequently reviewed by a panel o
f two experts who quantified several parameters regarding image analysis an
d film quality. Lesions were not described in 67 % of the cases and were mi
sinterpreted as benign processes in 33 % of cases. Comparison to previous c
hest radiographs and clinical information were seldom available on the repo
rt. Size of the lesions varied between 1 and 7 cm, location was primarily a
pical and paramediastinal, normal anatomy was highly or moderately complex
in 87 %, and distracting lesions were present in 63 % of the cases. Image q
uality was considered perfect in 3 cases only. Among all the factors respon
sible for missed lung cancer, certain factors can be improved as film quali
ty, comparison with previous radiographs, and better awareness of clinical
information.