Rg. Van Driesche et al., Effect of parasitoid release pattern on whitefly (Homoptera : Aleyrodidae)control in commercial poinsettia, FLA ENTOMOL, 84(1), 2001, pp. 63-69
Under commercial poinsettia production conditions we compared two patterns
of parasitoid release for the aphelinid whitefly parasitoid Eretmocerus ere
micus Rose and Zolnerowich. We compared the currently used pattern of a fix
ed weekly release number (3 females per plant per week) to an experimental
pattern in which more parasitoids were released early in the crop (wks 1-8)
, followed by a lower number (wks 9-17), with the seasonal release average
still being 3 female parasitoids per plant per week. We further compared th
e outcome of these two treatments (fixed and variable) to a low release rat
e (1 parasitoid per pi per wk) of Encarsia formosa Gahan, an aphelinid para
sitoid widely used for whitefly control in greenhouse crops. In control cag
es without parasitoid releases, whitefly nymphal densities reached 15-32 li
ve nymphs per leaf, which was 7 to 16-fold greater than the acceptable leve
l at crop harvest. In cages in which parasitoid releases were made, whitefl
y nymphal densities were suppressed 99.8%, 96.8% and 50.9% by fixed-rate E.
eremicus, variable-rate E. eremicus, and low-rate E. formosa treatments, r
espectively. In greenhouse populations, the final densities of live whitefl
y nymphs per leaf were significantly higher in the E. formosa treatment tha
n the two E. eremicus treatments. Releases of low numbers off. formosa prov
ided commercially acceptable control in only one of two greenhouses. There
was no difference between the fixed and variable release rate treatments of
f, eremicus, indicating that whitefly suppression was not increased by conc
entrating the release of this parasitoid early in the crop.