Adaptation and sensitivity to postural change in sitting

Citation
Mg. Helander et al., Adaptation and sensitivity to postural change in sitting, HUMAN FACT, 42(4), 2000, pp. 617-629
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology,"Engineering Management /General
Journal title
HUMAN FACTORS
ISSN journal
00187208 → ACNP
Volume
42
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
617 - 629
Database
ISI
SICI code
0018-7208(200024)42:4<617:AASTPC>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
We used 3 psychophysics methods to determine perceptible changes in seat he ight, seat pan angle, and backrest angle using an experimental chair. In th e method of adjustment, the chosen chair settings were affected by the init ial setting. For example, a high initial setting of the seat height led to a high selected setting and a low setting led to a low value. The differenc e between settings was referred to as not noticeable difference (NND). The method of limits was used to determine acceptable chair settings using verb al limits such as "too high" and "too low." Using the method of constant st imuli, just noticeable differences (JNDs) were determined for chair height (1.5 cm), seat pan angle (1.2 degrees) and backrest angle (1.7 degrees). Th e corresponding values for NNDs and verbal limits were about twice as large : chair height (2.5 cm), seat pan angle (4 degrees) and backrest angle (3 d egrees). NNDs and verbal limits are unobtrusive measures that are considere d more valid than JNDs, which exaggerate the need for adjustability. The re sults have practical implications for the design of office chairs.