U-shaped production lines: A review of theory and practice

Authors
Citation
J. Miltenburg, U-shaped production lines: A review of theory and practice, INT J PRO E, 70(3), 2001, pp. 201-214
Citations number
44
Categorie Soggetti
Engineering Management /General
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS
ISSN journal
09255273 → ACNP
Volume
70
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
201 - 214
Database
ISI
SICI code
0925-5273(20010418)70:3<201:UPLARO>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Most writers describe the U-shaped production line as the special type of c ellular manufacturing used in just-in-time (JIT) production systems. JIT is defined to be an umbrella term for a number of techniques whose purpose is to improve product quality and cost by eliminating all waste in the produc tion system. The U-line arranges machines around a U-shaped line in the ord er in which production operations are performed. Operators work inside the IJ-line. One operator supervises both the entrance and the exit of the line , machine-work is separated from operator-work so that machines work indepe ndently as much as possible. Standard operation charts specify exactly how all work is done. U-lines may be simple or complex. U-lines are rebalanced periodically when production requirements change. The U-line satisfies the flow manufacturing principle. This requires operators to be multi-skilled t o operate several different machines or processes. It also requires operato rs to work standing up and walking. When setup times are negligible, U-line s are operated as mixed-model lines where each station is able to produce a ny product in any cycle. When setup times are larger, multiple U-lines are formed and dedicated to different products. 114 US and Japanese U-lines are examined in this study. The average U-line has 10.2 machines and 3.4 opera tors. About one-quarter of all U-lines are manned by one operator and so ru n in chase mode. The reported benefits are impressive. Productivity improve d by an average of 76%. WIP dropped by 86%. Leadtime shrunk by 75%. Defecti ve rates dropped by 83%. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved .