This article retraces the emergence and shows the implications of current r
egulative frameworks in the field of urban drug policy. Framed by an analyt
ical perspective that is based on the concept of urban governance, the arti
cle focuses on the processes by which cooperation and coordination between
various conflicting governmental and nongovernmental agencies are achieved
to address drug-related problems in the major agglomerations of Switzerland
, as well as in the metropolitan areas of Amsterdam, Glasgow and Frankfurt
am Main. In the first part, it is shown that these problems are structured
and debated along a conflict between advocates of the public-health approac
h and those of the public-order approach in the field of drug policy, as we
ll as, to a lesser extent, a conflict between core cities and fringe munici
palities about spillover effects related to the provision of services for u
sers of illegal drugs. It is argued that this stems from a general tension
between the goals of an attractiveness policy aimed at enhancing local econ
omic development, and the necessities of social policy needed to address ur
ban social problems. The second part examines the emergence of mechanisms o
f governance aimed at addressing drug-related urban problems. It is argued
that a 'social public order' regime emerged to regulate drug-related urban
problems, controlling urban practices of drug users by a combination of pol
ice and social work. In addition, it is held that in Switzerland. where soc
ial policy is traditionally confined to municipalities, these mechanisms of
governance contributed to the emergence of metropolitan regions as new ter
ritorial actors in the field of drug policy.