A response surface method (RSM) applied to a transonic airfoil design probl
em is studied with other optimization methods. The objective function and c
onstraints of RSM are modeled by quadratic polynomials, and the response su
rfaces are constructed by Navier-Stokes analyses in the transonic how regio
n. To assess the advantages of RSM, the design results by RSM are compared
to those of a gradient-based optimization method (GBOM), namely, the discre
te adjoint variable method. Comparisons are made for various sets of design
variables and geometric constraints. It is observed that the response surf
ace method is able to capture the nonlinear behavior of the objective funct
ion and smooth out high-frequency noises in transonic regime. These feature
s enable the method to design a shock-free transonic airfoil with fewer des
ign variables than in GBOM. In addition, RSM gives robust design results fo
r the geometric constraints with different characteristics, whereas the GBO
M depends heavily on the method of constraint specification. The results in
dicate that RSM could be used as an effective design tool for multidiscipli
nary design optimization problems, in which flowfields of design conditions
are significantly nonlinear with many constraints imposed.