Effects of supplement type on animal performance, forage intake, digestion, and ruminal measurements of growing beef cattle

Citation
Tn. Bodine et al., Effects of supplement type on animal performance, forage intake, digestion, and ruminal measurements of growing beef cattle, J ANIM SCI, 79(4), 2001, pp. 1041-1051
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE
ISSN journal
00218812 → ACNP
Volume
79
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1041 - 1051
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8812(200104)79:4<1041:EOSTOA>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Two experiments were conducted to determine the effects of supplement type on the rate of gain by heifers grazing bermudagrass and on the intake, appa rent total-tract OM digestibility, ruminal fermentation, digesta kinetics, in situ DM digestibility, and forage protein degradation by steers fed prai rie hay. In Exp. 1, 45 heifers (284 +/- 24 kg) grazed a bermudagrass pastur e for 91 d in the late summer to determine the effects of no supplement (CO N), or one of four individually fed monensin-containing (150 mg/[heifer.d]) supplements (MINCS; 0.1 kg of mineral mix with 0.2 kg [DM] of cottonseed h ulls as a carrier/[heifer.d]), a pelleted protein supplement (PROT; 1 kg of DM, 242 g of degradable intake protein [DIP]/[heifer.d]), or high-fiber (H F) and high-grain (HG) (2 kg of DM, 243 and 257 g of DIP, respectively/[hei fer.d]) pelleted energy supplements. In Exp. 2, four ruminally cannulated s teers (311 +/- 22 kg) with ad libitum access to low-quality (4% DIP, 73% ND F, 40% ADF) prairie hay were individually fed monensin-containing (200 mg/[ steer.d]) treatments consisting of 1) mineral mix + corn (MINCR; 0.1 kg of mineral and 0.4 kg of cracked corn [DM] as a carrier, 19 g of DIP/[steer.d] ), 2) PROT (1.4 kg of DM, 335 g of DIP/[steer.d]), 3) HF, or 4) HG (2.9 kg of DM, 340 and 360 g of DIP, respectively/[steer.d]) in a 4 x 4 Latin squar e with 14-d adaptation and 6-d sampling periods. In Exp. 1, the HF-, HG-, a nd PROT-supplemented heifers had greater (P < 0.01) rates of gain than CON heifers, and the HF- and HG-supplemented heifers tended (P < 0.11) to gain more weight than those fed PROT. In Exp. 2, steers fed PROT consumed more ( P < 0.05) hay OM than HF and HG, or MINCR. Total OM intake was greater (P < 0.01) by supplemented steers than MINCR-fed cattle. Hay OM digestibility w as not affected (P = 0.19) by treatment, but total diet OM digestibility wa s greater (P < 0.01) for HF- and HG-than for MINCR- or PROT-fed steers. The rate of in situ DM digestibility was greater (P < 0.01) for HF, HG, and PR OT than for MINCR. Results from these studies indicate that feeding milo- v s fiber-based energy supplements formulated to provide adequate DIP did not result in different forage intake, OM digestibility, or in situ DM digesti bility, whereas both increased ADG in heifers consuming low-quality forages compared with unsupplemented or mineral- or protein-supplemented cattle. A n adequate DIP:TDN balance decreased the negative associative effects often observed when large quantities of high-starch supplements are fed with low -quality hay.