Cohesin-dockerin interaction in cellulosome assembly - A single hydroxyl group of a dockerin domain distinguishes between nonrecognition and high affinity recognition
A. Mechaly et al., Cohesin-dockerin interaction in cellulosome assembly - A single hydroxyl group of a dockerin domain distinguishes between nonrecognition and high affinity recognition, J BIOL CHEM, 276(13), 2001, pp. 9883-9888
The assembly of enzyme components into the cellulosome complex is dictated
by the cohesin-dockerin interaction. In a recent article (Mechaly, A, Yaron
, S,, Lamed, R., Fierobe, H.-P., Belaich, A., Belaich, J.-P., Shoham, Y., a
nd Bayer, E. A. (2000) Proteins 39, 170-177), we provided experimental evid
ence that four previously predicted dockerin residues play a decisive role
in the specificity of this high affinity interaction, although additional r
esidues were also implicated. In the present communication, we examine furt
her the contributing factors for the recognition of a dockerin by a cohesin
domain between the respective cellulosomal systems of Clostridium thermoce
llum and Clostridium cellulolyticum, In this context, the four confirmed re
sidues were analyzed for their individual effect on selectivity, In additio
n, other dockerin residues were discerned that could conceivably contribute
to the interaction, and the suspected residues were similarly modified by
site-directed mutagenesis, The results indicate that mutation of a single r
esidue from threonine to leucine at a given position of the C. thermocellum
dockerin differentiates between its nonrecognition and high affinity recog
nition (K-a similar to 10(9) M-1) by a cohesin from C. cellulolyticum, This
suggests that the presence or absence of a single decisive hydroxyl group
is critical to the observed biorecognition, This study further implicates a
dditional residues as secondary determinants in the specificity of interact
ion, because interconversion of selected residues reduced intraspecies self
-recognition by at least three orders of magnitude. Nevertheless, as the la
tter mutageneses served to reduce but not annul the cohesin-dockerin intera
ction within this species, it follows that other subtle alterations play a
comparatively minor role in the recognition between these two modules.