When environmental regulatory bodies formulate control plans, it is incumbe
nt upon them to try to achieve the stated goals in an economically efficien
t manner. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is presently develop
ing regulations to limit the influence of transported ozone on areas that a
re having difficulty meeting the ambient air quality standard. EPA has prop
osed stringent control measures for emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) in 2
2 states of the eastern US. The strategy would necessitate the use of selec
tive catalytic reduction or similar high-performance technology on almost a
ll major power plants in the region, as well as extensive controls on indus
trial sources. This paper suggests several alternative approaches that woul
d achieve equal or better environmental improvement at lower cost. These in
clude focusing control efforts on sources closer to the North-east Corridor
, pushing controls on close-in sources to a higher level of technology perf
ormance, and relaxing the stringency of requirements for states remote from
ozone problem areas. AII the approaches examined are two to three times mo
re cost-effective than EPA's proposed approach in the North-east Corridor.