This paper suggests an analytical framework for the understanding of what m
akes places meaningful. In an interview study, respondents were asked to li
st places they considered important and describe what these places meant to
them. The analysis of the interviews indicates that meanings spontaneously
attributed to places by the respondents can be mapped around and between t
he three poles of self, others and environment. In addition, a number of un
derlying dimensions of meaning emerge: distinction, valuation, continuity a
nd change. The relationship between these results and earlier empirical res
earch is discussed. The paper also points out that, to a great extent, the
empirical findings converge with theoretical conceptualizations of place wi
thin social science. It therefore argues that the results of empirical stud
ies need not be limited to 'special I,laces', but may also, using the sugge
sted analytical framework, contribute to more general empirical and theoret
ical discussions regarding the roles and meanings of place in contemporary
society. (C) 2001 Academic Press.