We show that the effects of overfitting and underfitting a vector autoregre
ssive (VAR) model are strongly asymmetric for VAR summary statistics involv
ing higher-order dynamics (such as impulse response functions, variance dec
ompositions, or long-run forecasts). Underfit models often underestimate th
e true dynamics of the population process and may result in spuriously tigh
t confidence intervals. These insights are important for applied work, rega
rdless of how the lag order is determined. In addition. they provide a new
perspective on the trade-offs between alternative lag order selection crite
ria. We provide evidence that, contrary to conventional wisdom, for many st
atistics of interest to VAR users the point and interval estimates based on
the AIC compare favourably to those based on the more parsimonious Schwarz
Information Criterion and Hannan-Quinn Criterion. Copyright (C) 2001 John
Wiley & Sons, Ltd.