Gate questions are commonly used to shorten structured interviews, by not p
robing negative responses with more detailed questions. This study quantifi
ed cases of aborted suicide attempts that would have been missed, if we had
skipped detailed questions following a gate. To accomplish this, we interv
iewed a random sample of 135 adult psychiatric inpatients concerning their
past suicidal behavior. Using our structured interview, subjects were asked
a general question about aborted suicide attempts, and then asked method-s
pecific questions regardless of their response to the general "gate" questi
on. Of the seventy subjects who were found to have histories of aborted att
empts. 44.3% answered "no" to the gate question. Comparing these "false neg
ative" subjects to "true positives." who had answered "yes" to the gate que
stion and reported bona fide aborted attempts yielded no significant associ
ations with demographics, psychiatric diagnoses, or reported histories of a
ctual suicide attempts. Thus, a large number of subjects with aborted attem
pts would have been missed if a negative response to the gate question had
not been probed. Clinical and reasearch implications generally, as well as
implications for suicide assessment, are discussed. (C) 2001 Elsevier Scien
ce Ltd. All rights reserved.