Ch. Andrus et al., Finance modeling in the delivery of medical care in tertiary-care hospitals in the Department of Veterans Affairs, J SURG RES, 96(2), 2001, pp. 152-157
yyBackground. In the mid-1990s, the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) im
plemented the Veterans Equitable Resource Allocation (VERA), a new financia
l model developed to attempt to better distribute the similar to $18 billio
n annual budget among roughly 170 Veterans Administration Medical Centers (
VAMCs). VERA is based on a Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) model. VER
A provides reimbursement to each of the 22 regional Veterans Integrated Ser
vice Networks (VISNs), and subsequent VISN distribution to individual VAMCs
is based on an individual medical center's enrollment of unique social sec
urity numbers (uniques). In HMO vocabulary these are individual "covered li
ves."
Methods. Currently available demographic and staffing information regarding
the DVA's 23 tertiary hospital systems (Category 7 hospitals) on the KLF d
atabase (DVA Austin Data Base) and published information on the DVA website
were reviewed. The following was obtained: (1) staffing information-physic
ian and nurse full-time employment equivalent (FTEE) staffing; (2) patient
demographics and hospital workload-facility uniques (u), outpatient facilit
y uniques, average daily census (ADC), discharges, and outpatient clinic vi
sits. The following staffing ratios were calculated for both physician and
nursing: FTEE/ (u11000), FTEE/(discharges/1000), FTEE/(clinic visits/ 1000)
, FTEE/ADC. For all categories the means +/- SD were calculated and correla
tion coefficients were calculated on pertinent pairings.
Results. Although categorized as similar tertiary care facilities, the 23 "
Group 7" VA hospitals are anything but equivalent when reviewed using the V
ERA financing model with respect to physician staffing, nurse staffing, and
facility uniques. Using VERA methodology, average physician FTEE and total
nursing FTEE staffing/(u/1000) are 3.67 +/- 0.89 and 15.53 +/- 3.77, respe
ctively. Correlation statistics of staffing versus unique SSNs demonstrated
correlation coefficients of 0.46 and 0.59 with respect to physician and nu
rse staffing, respectively. On the other hand, when physician FTEE and nurs
ing FTEE staffing were compared with VAMC workload parameters (total ADC, d
ischarges, and outpatient visits), correlation coefficients were more consi
stent, ranging from 0.62 to 0.86.
Conclusions. In the VERA model, the reward of a larger annual budget for an
individual VAMC or the regional VISN is realized when staffing of VAMCs is
minimized, overall provided medical services (especially costly tertiary s
ervices) are limited, and the number of covered lives is maximized. A VAMC
staffing system that equates medical services delivered in a tertiary VAMC
setting based on an HMO model like VERA (where the user population is skewe
d toward the sicker, older patient) shows decreased correlation when compar
ed with VAMC workload model parameters. (C) 2001 Academic Press.