Competition became a major feature of urban policy in Britain during the 19
90s. The stimulus of competition was intended to improve regeneration polic
ies, partly by galvanizing the collective resources of local actors. This a
rticle draws upon the findings of recent empirical studies of regeneration
programs and partnerships to consider the implications of competitive urban
policy for the theory and practice of governance. It is argued that promot
ing partnerships ar,tong local institutions and improving the quality of re
generation schemes through competition require positive support from centra
l government. The responsibility for tackling difficult urban problems cann
ot simply be devolved to under-funded local initiatives.