Twelve patients with hemispatial neglect and two control groups were tested
to examine the effects of the Muller-Lyer and Judd illusions on bisection
behaviour. The studies were designed to investigate whether neglect patient
s were indeed unaware of the left sides of the illusory figures. In Experim
ent 1, participants were asked to describe the illusory figures prior to bi
section, whereas in Experiment 2, they compared two illusions whose fins, i
n the critical condition, differed on the left and then performed the bisec
tion. It was found that the illusions worked equally well in all three grou
ps. Interestingly, apart from one exception, almost all neglect patients ex
plicitly reported the left-sided fins in Experiment 1. Only five patients f
ailed to do so but only on an average of 16% of trials. In Experiment 2, si
x patients made errors in the comparison task but four of these patients di
d not neglect any left-sided fins in Experiment 1 (with the exception of th
ree overall trials for LC and EdR). This finding seems a good indication th
at the two tasks differ in their requirements. The comparison task may be p
erceived as harder as it requires discrimination rather than detection and
thus lead to more neglect type errors than the bisection task. In one negle
ct patient, the illusions consistently failed to work. This patient present
ed with an occipito-temporal and basal ganglia lesion and the mechanisms re
sponsible for the processing of simple visual features might have possibly
been impaired in her case. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserv
ed.