In five studies, we measured the extent to which subjects weight moral prod
uct attributes in different response modes. We found that nonprice judgment
s such as likelihood of purchase ratings were more reflective of expressed
moral attitudes than were pricing responses, and that holistic price evalua
tions were especially unlikely to reflect moral considerations. Post-task r
atings confirmed the preference results, as did an experiment controlling f
or the influence of task goals. Our results have implications for compatibi
lity theories of preference elicitation, the predictability of respondent r
atings of attribute unacceptability, and the measurement of utilities for m
orally charged attributes. (C) 2001 Academic Press.