In view of the evolving indications for device therapy in atrial arrhythmia
the accurate detection of high rate atrial events is a necessity. In a she
ep model of atrial fibrillation (AF) we observed a contradictory behavior o
f the Thera DR pacemaker. The pacemakers were programmed to deliver burst p
acing on detection of sinus rhythm (SR). Paradoxically, progressively more
inappropriate bursts were delivered during AF, at a higher sensitivity. Thi
s implied that the pacemaker interpreted AF as SR. We assessed the atrial d
etection of the Thera DR, Diamond, Saphir, and Marathon pacemakers during A
F, in a sheep model and in vitro using a waveform generator, gr counting th
e annotated atrial-sensed events reported by the pacemaker we charted the b
ehavior of the pacemakers at different sensitivities. At a higher sensitivi
ty both the Them DR and the Diamond paradoxically reported fewer atrial eve
nts during AF. This behavior led to inappropriate mode switching and incorr
ect diagnostic data collection. It could be reproduced in vitro. The Marath
on did not show this paradoxical undersensing in vivo or in vitro. This par
adoxical undersensing at a high sensitivity is dependent on the amplitude o
f the input signal and could not be explained by an overlap of programmable
timing parameters. It is caused by ringing of the atrial sensing amplifier
. At high atrial rates and a high sensitivity the ringing of the repetitive
atrial signal input results in blanking of the atrial amplifier. This obse
rvation may be relevant in the device management of patients with paroxysma
l AF.