TMJ disorders and myogenic facial pain: a discriminative analysis using the McGill Pain Questionnaire

Our aim was to assess the discriminative capacity of the McGill Pain Questi onnaire (MPQ) in patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders or w ith myogenous facial pain (MP). The MPQ was administered to 57 TMJ and 28 M P patients who were also asked to assess the level of pain using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Weighted MPQ item scores, subscale Pain Raring Indexes (PRI). total PRI and the number of words chosen were calculated. Mean scor es were tested for significant differences (Student's t-test). and the freq uency with which each descriptor was chosen by the patients in both groups was analyzed. Data were also processed through two systems based on a count er-propagation neural network: the Self-Organizing Map (SOM) system, and a cluster-like analysis. In the MP group, 16 out of 20 mean MPQ item scores a nd all mean PRI and VAS scores were significantly higher than those in the TMJ group. There was a marked difference in descriptor choice. In the TMJ g roup the following descriptors were chosen by 25% or more of the patients: tiring. troublesome, nagging. sore, tender. and aching. In the MP group the descriptors most frequently chosen were: 'exhausting' (57%), 'punishing' ( 50%), and pulling (47%). SOM analysis distributed the two groups in the two halves of the map: only two out of 28 MP cases (7%) and 12 out of 57 TMJ c asts (21%) were misplaced. The cluster-like analysis based on the 20 MPQ it em scores correctly recognized 94.73% of TMJ patients and 89.28% of MP pati ents. In conclusion, the MPQ consistently discriminated between TMJ and MP patients. Although the higher affective scores in the MP patients may be pa rtly induced by higher levels of anxiety in these patients. the data convin cingly show that the system's discriminative capacity relates to all MPQ su bscores and to the majority of the MPQ items. Moreover, within the same ite m. the choice of verbal descriptors varies consistently between the two gro ups of patients. (C) 2001 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.