The concepts of safety and danger as they pertain to the psychoanalyti
c situation are examined, with a special interest in casting aside fam
iliar unquestioned presumptions about the therapeutic effects of the a
nalyst and the setting as safe and therefore facilitating of self-disc
losure, insight, and change. The merit of viewing the situation as in
itself neither safe nor dangerous is argued, and problems are noted in
the uncritical acceptance of the illusion of safety and attempts to u
se it for therapeutic purposes. Such an illusion denies the psychologi
cal and biological vulnerability of all human beings, especially in re
lation to aggression. In the clinical setting, working from an unexami
ned presumption of safety interferes with full transference expression
and the analysis of aggression, often in the service of sparing the a
nalyst from fully experiencing the analysand's adult aggressive potent
ial. Contemporary interest in the analyst's authority, particularly ef
forts to undo it, can profitably be viewed as helping to maintain an i
llusion of safety during treatment in order to avoid the real dangers
that are experienced as present and that are therefore available for e
xploration and mastery.