The specific contribution of the person of the analyst-his or her attitudes
, fantasies, and entire range of emotional responses to the patient-have be
come the subject of much investigation in psychoanalytic literature, This p
aper describes the phenomenon of distinct and sometimes contradictory self-
experiences in analysts that develop as part of the moment-to-moment proces
s of a predominantly adaptive coping mechanism. It is suggested that at any
given point the analyst's perspectives (reflecting various self-states), l
ike those of the patient, are multiple, and that the analyst "chooses" to p
lace one such perspective,P at the center of experience. By choosing a cert
ain self-state, the analyst can adopt, for example a warm and loving stance
with a regressed and demanding patient, or be come harsh (e,g, setting bou
ndaries, ending a session) with one who seeks affection and protection.
This paper also suggests that the capacity do move between versions of self
-states, to see them as complementary even when they are; paradoxical, prom
otes a deeper understanding,bg of paradoxes in the personality of the patie
nt. Only when the analyst maintains a dialogue between various dissociated
aspects of his or her analytic experience can a dialogue of this kind begin
in the patient.