Mp. Roy et al., Psychological, cardiovascular, and metabolic correlates of individual differences in cortisol stress recovery in young men, PSYCHONEURO, 26(4), 2001, pp. 375-391
The relationship of free salivary cortisol stress recovery and basal cortis
ol with psychological, cardiovascular and metabolic factors was investigate
d in 82 healthy young men. Blood pressure, heart ratel cortisol and mood we
re assessed during a single laboratory session involving mental arithmetic
and speech tasks, and lipid profiles were analysed from a fasting blood sam
ple. Participants were divided into high (n=31) and low (n=51) cortisol str
ess recovery groups on the basis of the magnitude of changes between the pe
ak cortisol responses to tasks and the lowest levels recorded at the end of
a 30 min post-stress rest period. The high recovery group showed consisten
t increases in cortisol following each of the tasks, while the low recovery
group showed little change across the session. Cortisol levels in the two
groups did not differ at the end of the pest-stress recovery period. The gr
oups were indistinguishable in age, body mass index, smoking and alcohol co
nsumption, and did not differ in psychological characteristics including an
xiety, depression and perceived social support. However, the high stress re
covery group had elevated low density lipoprotein cholesterol and total cho
lesterol/high density lipoprotein ratios, suggesting raised cardiovascular
disease risk. The high stress recovery group also reported greater psycholo
gical activation during tasks, and greater recent minor life stress, than d
id the low recovery group. There was no association between rate of cortiso
l recovery and cardiovascular responses to tasks. But resting cortisol was
related to blood pressure stress reactivity, suggesting that cortisol playe
d a permissive role in augmenting sympathetically-driven cardiovascular res
ponses. The results suggest that the rate of cortisol stress recovery is as
sociated with variations in metabolic risk, and with differences in psychol
ogical state but not trait characteristics. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd.
All rights reserved.