Rationale: Buprenorphine is a partial mu opiold agonist under development a
s a sublingual (SL) medication for opioid dependence treatment in the Unite
d States. Because buprenorphine may be abused, tablets combining buprenorph
ine with naloxone in a 4:1 ratio have been developed to reduce that risk. L
ow doses of injected buprenorphine/naloxone have been tested in opiold-depe
ndent subjects, but higher doses (more than 3 mg of either medication) and
direct comparisons to SL buprenorphine/naloxone have not been examined. Obj
ec tives: To assess and compare the effects of intramuscular (IM) versus SL
buprenorphine/naloxone in opioid-dependent volunteers. Methods: Opioid-dep
endent volun teers were maintained on 40 mg per day of oral hydro- morphone
while on a residential research ward. After safety testing in two pilot su
bjects, participants (n=8) were tested with both IM and SL buprenorphine/na
loxone (1/0.25, 2/0.5, 4/1, 8/2, 16/4 mg); IM hydromorphone (10 mg) and nal
oxone (0.25 mg); both IM and SL buprenorphine alone (8 mg); and placebo. Te
st sessions were twice per week, dosing was double blind. Results: Intramus
cular buprenorphine/naloxone produced dose-related increases on indices of
opioid antagonist effects. Effects were consistent with naloxone-precipitat
ed withdrawal, and were short-lived. As withdrawal effects dissipated, euph
oric opioid agonist effects from buprenorphine did not appear. Sublingual b
upre- norphine/naloxone produced neither opioid agonist nor antagonist effe
cts. Conclusions: Intramuscular injection of buprenorphine/naloxone precipi
tates withdrawal in opioid dependent persons; therefore, the combination ha
s a low abuse potential by the injection route in this population. Sublingu
al buprenorphine/naloxone by tablet is well tolerated in opioid dependent s
ubjects, and shows neither adverse effects (i.e., precipitated withdrawal)
nor a high abuse potential (i.e., opioid agonist effects).