Assessment of pituitary gonadotropin release to gonadotropin releasing hormone/thyroid-stimulating hormone stimulation in women with systemic sclerosis
G. La Montagna et al., Assessment of pituitary gonadotropin release to gonadotropin releasing hormone/thyroid-stimulating hormone stimulation in women with systemic sclerosis, RHEUMATOLOG, 40(3), 2001, pp. 310-314
Objective. To evaluate basal and dynamic levels of pituitary gonadotropin r
elease in female systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients of childbearing age and
in post-menopausal SSc patients.
Methods. We performed stimulation tests for gonadotropin-releasing hormone
(GnRH) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TRH) during the early follicular ph
ase in 12 women of childbearing age [mean age (S.E.M.) 34.8 (2.4) yr] with
SSc to determine serum concentrations of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)
, luteinizing hormone (LI-I) and prolactin. Blood samples were also obtaine
d from six post-menopausal women with SSc [mean age 46.8 (2.3) yr], after T
RH stimulation; only serum prolactin concentration was determined, because
elevated basal concentrations of FSH and LH were expected, Hormone concentr
ations were estimated by radioimmunoassay. Comparisons were made with healt
hy control women matched for age and reproductive status.
Results. In SSc patients of childbearing age, basal FSH, LII and oestradiol
(E-2) levels were not significantly different from those in controls, wher
eas basal prolactin concentration was significantly higher than in controls
(P = 0.0001). After the stimulation test, the peak concentrations of FSH (
P = 0.0001) and prolactin (P < 0.0001) were significantly higher than in co
ntrols. The net integrated response curves [net area under the curve (AUC)]
for FSH and LII did not differ significantly between SSc patients and cont
rols. On the contrary, the net AUC for prolactin in response to TRH stimula
tion was significantly higher than in controls (P = 0.001). In post-menopau
sal patients, basal E-2, FSH, LH and prolactin levels were not significantl
y different between women with SSc and controls. However, after TRH stimula
tion, peak levels and net AUC for prolactin were not significantly higher i
n patients than those in controls. No significant correlations were found b
etween basal and stimulated FSH, LH and prolactin levels and the severity o
f involvement of various organ systems. Multiple regression analysis showed
that basal and stimulated prolactin concentrations were associated with sk
in sclerosis and peripheral vascular and lung involvement.
Conclusion. Our results suggest that subclinical primary hypogonadism can o
ccur in SSc patients. They also confirm an alteration in the mechanism for
prolactin secretion and release, which may not only contribute to further d
isturbance of the reproductive axis but may also have an influence on the d
isease.