Comparing the predictive validity of first grade teacher ratings and reading-related tests on third grade levels of reading skills in young children exposed to poverty

The purpose of this study was to compare the relative utility of teacher ra tings versus several kinds of reading-related tests measured in the spring of first grade in predicting third grade levels of reading skills in a samp le of predominantly ethnic minority children exposed to poverty (N = 170). The reading-related tests included measures of children's print and vocabul ary knowledge and phonological awareness. Linear regression analyses indica ted that, in general, teacher ratings predicted later individual difference s in reading ability with similar accuracy to that of the reading-related t ests. Children were next classified as either reading impaired or normally achieving based on their standardized reading scores in third grade. Logist ic regression analyses demonstrated that the first grade teacher ratings cl assified children into third grade reading groups with a high level of accu racy (at least 73% of the sample correctly identified) and comparable to cl assification based on reading-related test performance. The results provide strong support for the utility of teacher ratings as a relatively efficien t and cost effective method for early identification of disadvantaged child ren at high risk of developing reading failure.