The success of several environmental trading markets (ETMs) has led to prop
osals for broader use of ETMs in environmental and resource management poli
cy. The successful ETMs all share a basic feature-they exchange units of tr
ade that are fungible, such as tons of sulfur dioxide or kilos of fish. Thi
s feature of trading promotes resource allocation efficiency while advancin
g environmental protection. But most commodities exchanged in current and p
roposed ETMs, such as wetlands and endangered species habitat, exhibit nonf
ungibilities across the dimensions of type, time, and space. Using ETMs to
trade these commodities is no longer trading "environmental apples for appl
es," and thus the rationale for using ETMs is called into question. In this
article, the authors develop a comprehensive analytical framework for eval
uating ETMs from the perspective of commodity nonfungibility and explore th
e challenge presented by trading environmental apples for oranges. They arg
ue that by focusing on nonfungible commodities and their currencies we can
better explain the design of ETMs, their rules of exchange, and provisions
for public participation.