Based on cytoarchitectonic criteria, the primate pulvinar nucleus has been
subdivided into medial (PM), lateral (PL), and inferior (PI) regions. Howev
er, these subdivisions show no correlation with those established by electr
ophysiological, immunocytochemical, or neuroanatomical tracer studies. In t
his work, we studied the connections of the pulvinar nucleus of Cebus monke
y with visual areas V1, V2, V4, MT, and PO by means of retrograde fluoresce
nt tracers injected into these areas. Based on the projection zones to cort
ical visual areas, the visual portion of the pulvinar. of Cebus monkey was
subdivided into three subregions: P1, P2, and P3, similar to those describe
d in the macaque (Ungerleider ct al., 1984). In Cebus, P1 includes the cent
rolateral portion of traditionally defined PI and adjacent portion of FL. P
? is located in the dorsal portion of PL and P3 includes the medial portion
of FI and extends dorsally into adjacent PL and PM. In addition, eve studi
ed the histology of the pulvinar using multiple criteria, such as cytoarchi
tecture and myeloarchitecture; histochemistry for cytochrome oxidase, NADPH
-diaphorase, and acetylcholinesterase; and immunocytochemistry for two calc
ium-binding proteins, calbindin and parvalbumin, and for a neurofilament re
cognized by the SMI-32 antibody. Some of these stains, mainly calbindin, sh
owed additional subdivisions of the Cebus pulvinar, beyond the traditional
PI, FL, and PM. Based on this immunohistochemical staining, the border of P
I is moved dorsally above the brachium of the superior colliculus and PI ca
n be subdivided in five regions (PIP, PIM, PIC, PIL, and PILS). Regions P1,
P2, and P3 defined based on efferent connections with cortical visual area
s are not architectonically/neurochemically homogeneous. Rather. they appea
r to consist of further chemoarchitectonic subdivisions. These distinct his
tochemical regions might be related to different functional modules of visu
al processing within one connectional area.