Background and Objectives The haemoglobin colour scale (HCS) has been devel
oped as a simple, reliable and inexpensive clinical device for diagnosing a
naemia and estimating its severity when laboratory-based haemoglobinometry
is not available. The purpose of this study was to assess its validity for
screening blood donors for anaemia.
Material and Methods The HCS was tested at five blood transfusion centres o
n a total of 2801 donors. Blood was obtained by skin puncture as part of th
e routine procedure at the donor sessions. HCS readings were compared with
screening by the copper sulphate method, which was in routine use in the ce
ntres, and with haemoglobin (Hb) measurements by means of calibrated HemoCu
e haemoglobinometers. HCS readings were considered as normal when the readi
ngs were greater than or equal to 12 g/dl.
Results Analysis of the paired results showed that the HCS had an accuracy
of 97.5% in distinguishing subjects with normal Hb from those below the acc
eptable limit, when checked against the HemoCue. The HCS was more reliable
than the copper-sulphate specific-gravity method, yielding 3.7% false readi
ngs compared with 6.1% false readings, respectively. When discrimination wa
s set at 12 g/dl with the HemoCue, the HCS gave an incorrect reading in 2.4
% of donors. The majority of these false results (44 donors; 1.58%) were ca
used by the HCS indicating rejection of the donor (i.e, Hb < 12 g/dl) when
the correct Hb was higher, whilst in 23 donors (0.82%) the HCS incorrectly
indicated a normal Hb; however, in all but four of these donors the correct
Hb values were 11.0-11.9 g/dl, and none were below 10 g/dl.
Conclusion The operators were able to master the HCS technique after a few
minutes of practice, and all found the test to be user friendly and easy to
read. The HCS is proposed as a replacement for the copper sulphate method
for blood transfusion donor selection.