H. Berth et T. Suslow, Validity of an electronic content-analysis instrument for anxiety measurement - The Dresden Anxiety Dictionary, Z KLIN PSYC, 49(1), 2001, pp. 88-105
Citations number
61
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KLINISCHE PSYCHOLOGIE PSYCHIATRIE UND PSYCHOTHERAPIE
Content analysis has a long history in clinical psychological research. Rec
ently, it regains attention because of rapid technological developments in
the field of data processing. This article introduces the Dresden Anxiety D
ictionary (DAW), a German computerised version of the Gottschalk-Gleser anx
iety scales. In the present study the validity of this new method was asses
sed. Measures of trait and state anxiety were administered to 60 subjects a
nd speech samples were obtained. The DAW presented a good validity showing
high correlations with conventionally derived Gottschalk-Gleser scores. The
DAW showed also substantial correlations with another content analytic met
hod, the Affective Dictionary Ulm (ADU). We found evidence that content ana
lytic anxiety measures differ in their measurement construct from self-desc
riptive questionnaires (BAI and STAI) which is consistent with previous res
earch findings.