I. Chang et al., Alcohol use inventory: screening and assessment of first-time driving-while-impaired offenders. II. Typology and predictive validity, ALC ALCOHOL, 36(2), 2001, pp. 122-130
This study evaluated the use of Alcohol Use Inventory (AUI) for driving-whi
le impaired (DWI) screening, by determining whether DWI offenders (n = 1644
). grouped according to their reported alcohol involvement on the AUI. woul
d have different rates of recidivism in a 5-year follow-up. Cluster analysi
s using the six second-order scales produced six groups (clusters 1-6) desc
ribed as the Low-Profile (50%). Alcohol-Preoccupation (14%). Enhanced (22%)
. Enhanced-Disrupt (9%). Anxious-Disrupt (3%). and High-Profile (IR) types.
They were characterized by different sociodemographic profiles. Members of
cluster 4 were associated with the highest DWI recidivism rate (40%). comm
itting one or more Further DWI. and clusters 5 and 6 were associated with t
he highest rate of committing two or more DWIs. Rates of subsequent traffic
convictions and crashes were. however, not statistically different among t
he clusters. Predictors of DWI recidivism included male gender, young age,
less-educated, high blood-alcohol concentration at arrest and clusters of 3
and 4. Different typologies indicated that the needs for treatment might b
e different. Evaluators should keep in mind the strength of AUI. use risk f
actors identified in the study. and take measures of test-taking defensiven
ess to enhance overall predictive validity.