Longitudinal growth study of male Japanese junior high school athletes

Citation
K. Nariyama et al., Longitudinal growth study of male Japanese junior high school athletes, AM J HUM B, 13(3), 2001, pp. 356-364
Citations number
61
Categorie Soggetti
Sociology & Antropology","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN BIOLOGY
ISSN journal
10420533 → ACNP
Volume
13
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
356 - 364
Database
ISI
SICI code
1042-0533(200105/06)13:3<356:LGSOMJ>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
The aim of this study was to establish the pattern of adolescent growth in height of male Japanese athletes, and to compare their growth with appropri ate controls. The sample consisted of 126 baseball, 39 basketball, 83 socce r, and 53 volleyball players, and 36 nonathletes. The data were collected r etrospectively in six public schools in Fukui Prefecture of Western Japan b etween 1970 and 1987. All subjects were measured at yearly intervals betwee n the age of 6 and 18 years. The total number of measurement occasions for the 337 subjects amounted to 4,134. Athletes trained between 13 and 18 h/we ek. Individual growth patterns were determined by fitting Preece Baines mod el I to each individual's serial data. Various biological parameters were d erived from the fitted curves. The results indicated that the average growt h pattern of these adolescent athletes did not differ substantially from th e control group. Volleyball players were significantly taller at 18 years ( +3 cm) than the nonathletes (Student's t-test, P < 0.05). Soccer players sh owed a slight tendency towards late maturation with age at take-off and at peak velocity about half a year later than in nonathletes (Student's t-test , P < 0.05). The 2.3 cm gain in body height due to the later onset of the p ubertal growth spurt in soccer players was counterbalanced by a 0.7 cm smal ler prepubertal height and a 0.9 cm smaller adolescent gain, so that they e nded up slightly, but not significantly, taller than the controls (+0.7 cm) , The small differences in growth pattern observed between the nonathletes and the various sports suggest that, in contrast with top-level athletes, b ody size and maturation rate were not important selective factors in the va rious groups of athletes of the present study. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.