As more studies adopt the approach of whole-genome screening, geneticists a
re faced with the challenge of having to interpret results from traditional
approaches that were not designed for genome-scan data. Frequently, two-po
int analysis by the LOD method is performed to search for signals of linkag
e throughout the genome, for each of hundreds or even thousands of markers.
This practice has raised the question of how to adjust the significance le
vel for the fact that multiple tests are being performed. Various recommend
ations have been made, but no consensus has emerged. In this article, we pr
opose a new method, the confidence-set approach, that circumvents the need
to correct for the level of significance according to the number of markers
tested. In the search for the gene location of a monogenic disorder, multi
plicity adjustment is not needed in order to maintain the desired level of
confidence. For complex diseases involving multiple genes, one needs only t
o adjust the level of significance according to the number of disease genes
-a much smaller number than the number of markers in a genome screen-to ens
ure a predetermined genomewide confidence level. Furthermore, our formulati
on of the tests enables us to localize disease genes to small genomic regio
ns, an extremely desirable feature that the traditional LOD method lacks. O
ur simulation study shows that, for sib-pair data, even when the coverage p
robability of the confidence set is chosen to be as high as 99%, our approa
ch is able to implicate only the markers that are closely linked to the dis
ease genes.