Postoperative pain management quality assurance program: impact of the consensus conference of the French Society of anaesthesiology and intensive care.

Objective: To assess the impact of a pain management quality assurance prog ram (PQAP) after abdominal surgery. The means used were mainly based on the French Society of anaesthesiology's pain management guidelines. Study design: Prospective evaluation using a before after study design: two audits among surgical patients: a first one in 1997 before implementation of PQAP, and a second one year later. Patients and methods: First, standards were defined including objectives ab out pain relief and patient satisfaction. After analysis of discrepancy obs erved between these objectives and the data of the first audit, a pain mana gement program was introduced that included education of physicians, nurses and patients, systematic assessment of pain, organized pain relief protoco ls and implementation of modern analgesic technologies. Results: 201 consecutive inpatients were evaluated in the first audit, and 117 in the second one. Comparing the second audit with baseline, the visual analog pain scores decreased during the five postoperative days, and the r ate of very satisfied patients increased (36% versus 26%). 43% of the patie nts were given a regular analgesic medication in 1998 versus 15% in 1997. 6 5% of medications were administered with an effective interval between dose s versus 47% in 1997. Patient-controlled techniques were used in 28% of the cases in 1998 versus 9% in 1997. Conclusion: The PQAP provided an improvement in efficacy of postoperative p ain management in our unit, with the help of the overall ward staff, but wi thout requiring personnel specially qualified. (C) 2001 Editions scientifiq ues et medicales Elsevier SAS.