J. Jung et L. Lidfors, Effects of amount of milk, milk flow and access to a rubber teal on cross-sucking and non-nutritive sucking in dairy calves, APPL ANIM B, 72(3), 2001, pp. 201-213
The aim of this study was to test the effects of different amounts of milk,
how rate of milk, and access to a teat after milk intake on non-nutritive
sucking on an empty teat and on cross-sucking on other calves in Bos taurus
dairy calves. An additional aim was to test if calves prefer to perform no
n-nutritive sucking on a teat with the taste of milk or on a clean teat. Fi
rst experiment involved 11 groups of three calves during gradual decrease f
rom 5 to 2.5 and 1 to 01 of whole milk per meal twice daily. Milk flow was
either 0.5 or 1 1/min, and the teat buckets were either left or removed aft
er milk intake. When the calves were fed with 51 of milk, non-nutritive suc
king and cross-sucking decreased (P < 0.001), compared to 1 and 2.5 1. Remo
ving the empty teat after mill;intake increased cross-sucking (P < 0.001).
Slow milk flow reduced non-nutritive sucking after milk intake (P < 0.05),
but did not influence cross-sucking. Duration of recorded milk intake was s
imilar with fast flow and 51 of milk, compared to slow flow and 2.51 of mil
k. The latter combination increased non-nutritive sucking and cross-sucking
, suggesting that amount of milk is more important than duration of milk in
take.
Second experiment was carried out on 12 individually kept calves. The calve
s received 2.51 of milk either in an open bucket, in a rubber teat bucket,
or half/half in both buckets. When not used for feeding, the open bucket an
d the teat bucket were filled and emptied again to make them 'tasty' with s
ome drops of milk. The tasty teat bucket was either removed or present afte
r milk intake. The calves had always access to a second clean teat bucket.
Source of milk had no influence on recorded behaviour after milk intake. Th
e tasty teat was sucked for twice as long as the clean one when both teats
were present (P < 0.001). When the tasty teat was removed, the calves incre
ased sucking on the clean teat (P < 0.001), but decreased total time spent
sucking (P < 0.001). We conclude that a high amount of milk and the presenc
e of the teat bucket after milk intake reduces cross-sucking, and that a cl
ean teat is less effective in encouraging calves to suck than a teat with t
aste of milk. (C) 2001 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.