Transfer appropriate processing (TAP) is the assumption that retrospective
memory test performance reflects the overlap between study and test phase p
rocessing. In a task analysis, we identify a similar sequential-type of pro
cessing overlap in prospective memory (ProM) situations. In addition, ProM
test performance can also involve a concurrent overlap between processes en
gaged for an ongoing task and those required for recognizing relevant cues.
A review of the ProM literature shows consistent TAP effects due to sequen
tial processing overlap manipulations, but inconclusive findings for concur
rent processing overlap manipulations. We examined the latter in a new expe
riment with young adult participants. The ongoing task required either sema
ntic or perceptual processing of words, and the ProM task required either s
emantic or perceptual processing of words. Consistent with TAP, performance
was higher when the ongoing task and the ProM task required the same kind
of processing (i.e. semantic-semantic, perceptual-perceptual) rather than d
ifferent kinds of processing (i.e. semantic-perceptual, perceptual-semantic
). Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.