As shown in numerous studies, a significant part of published clinical guid
elines is tainted with different types of semantical errors that interfere
with their practical application. The adaptation of generic guidelines, nec
essitated by circumstances such as resource limitations within the applying
organization or unexpected events arising in the course of patient care, f
urther promotes the introduction of defects. Still, most current approaches
for the automation of clinical guidelines are lacking mechanisms, which ch
eck the overall correctness of their output. In the domain of software engi
neering in general and in the domain of knowledge-based systems (KBS) in pa
rticular, a common strategy to examine a system for potential defects consi
sts in its verification. The focus of this work is to present an approach,
which helps to ensure the semantical correctness of clinical guidelines in
a three-step process. We use a particular guideline specification language
called Asbru to demonstrate our verification mechanism. A scenario-based ev
aluation of our method is provided based on a guideline for the artificial
ventilation of newborn infants. The described approach is kept sufficiently
general in order to allow its application to several other guideline repre
sentation formats. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.