In a recent article in this Review, Wasserfallen and Wittleder (Pricin
g initial public offerings: Evidence from Germany, European Economic R
eview 38, 1505-1517, 1994) [WW] provide evidence of the well-known und
erpricing phenomenon for 92 German IPOs coming to market in 1961-1987.
Using a larger sample of 189 firms from 1970-1993, this paper (i) rea
ssesses the evidence on underpricing in Germany, after choosing a diff
erent risk proxy to avoid potential endogeneity problems, and (ii) pro
vides evidence of long-run IPO performance. A number of new results em
erge. Stock market returns, the macroeconomic climate, insider retenti
on rates, and inverse offer size all affect underpricing positively. O
ver longer horizons German IPOs are poor investments, losing more than
twelve percent over their first three years of trading relative to th
e market (exclusive of the initial underpricing return), Negative perf
ormance is heavily concentrated after the end of WW's sampling period,
in the post-1987 cohort. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.