The article re-examines the proposition, first formulated rigorously b
y Bryant (A model of reserves, bank runs, and deposit insurance, Journ
al of Banking and Finance 4, 335-344, 1980) and Diamond and Dybvig (Ba
nk runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity, Journal of Political Econom
y 91, 401-419, 1983), that in a production economy with stochastic liq
uidity shocks to the household sector, banks serve to provide optimal
intertemporal insurance to consumers. The paper argues that in order t
o understand the moral hazard problems inherent in this insurance prob
lem, it is too narrow to consider solely the role of banks as provider
s of liquidity. The paper develops a model with several investment opp
ortunities in which banks have the additional function of asset divers
ification. This pooling of intermediation functions is shown to reduce
the moral hazard problem, thereby enhancing the stability of deposito
ry contracts and increasing the scope of the banks' insurance function
. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.