Influence of various machinery combinations, fuel proportions and storage capacities on costs for co-handling of straw and reed canary grass to district heating plants
D. Nilsson et Pa. Hansson, Influence of various machinery combinations, fuel proportions and storage capacities on costs for co-handling of straw and reed canary grass to district heating plants, BIO BIOENER, 20(4), 2001, pp. 247-260
Autumn-harvested cereal straw and spring-harvested reed canary grass (Phala
ris arundinacea L.) are renewable energy sources with similar material char
acteristics. The fuels can be harvested and handled with the same machines,
stored in the same stores, and fired with the same equipment. Thus, there
is a possibility to reduce costs and increase supply reliability at many lo
cations by using reed canary grass (RCG) as a complementary fuel in straw-f
ired district heating plants. The objective of this study was to find appro
priate machinery combinations, straw/RCG proportions and storage capacities
in order to reduce the total costs of the fuel system. The tool for the an
alyses was a modified dynamic simulation model for straw handling called SH
AM (Straw HAndling Model). To include handling of RCG, SHAM was extended wi
th submodules for calculation of daily fuel use, soil moisture contents and
early crop growth. The model was applied to a fictitious heating plant in
Enkoping in central Sweden as a case study. The simulations showed that the
total costs can be lowered by using both straw and RCG in suitable proport
ions instead of solely using straw, although the primary fuel cost for RCG
is more than three times higher per GJ than for straw. The choice of reserv
e base load fuel had a significant impact on the results, particularly when
the RCG proportion was small, because the consumption of the reserve fuel
became proportionally higher in such cases. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd.
All rights reserved.