The recovery, distribution, and population dynamics of wolves on the Scandinavian peninsula, 1978-1998

Citation
P. Wabakken et al., The recovery, distribution, and population dynamics of wolves on the Scandinavian peninsula, 1978-1998, CAN J ZOOL, 79(4), 2001, pp. 710-725
Citations number
82
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE
ISSN journal
00084301 → ACNP
Volume
79
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
710 - 725
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-4301(200104)79:4<710:TRDAPD>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
In 1966 the gray wolf (Canis lupus) was regarded as functionally extinct in Norway and Sweden (the Scandinavian peninsula). In 1978 the first confirme d reproduction on the peninsula in 14 years was recorded. During 20 success ive winters, from 1978-1979 to 1997-1998, the status, distribution, and dyn amics of the wolf population were monitored by snow-tracking as a cooperati ve Swedish-Norwegian project. After the 1978 reproduction in northern Swede n, all new pairs and packs were located in south-central parts of the Scand inavian peninsula. Between 1983 and 1990 wolves reproduced each year except 1986, but in only one territory. There was no population growth during thi s period and the population never exceeded 10 animals. In 1991 reproduction was recorded in two territories. After that there were multiple reproducti ons each year and the population started growing. In 1998 there were 50-72 wolves and six reproducing packs on the peninsula. Between 1991 and 1998 th e annual growth rate was 1.29 +/- 0.035 (mean +/- SD). A minimum of 25 litt ers were born during the study period. The early-winter size of packs repro ducing for the first time was 6.2 +/- 1.4 wolves (n = 9), and this decrease d with time during the study. The size of packs that had reproduced more th an once was 6.4 +/- 1.8 wolves (n = 12), and this increased with time over the study period. All but 1 of 30 reported wolf deaths were human-caused. T he annual mortality rate was 0.13 +/- 0.11, and this decreased with time du ring the study period. The minimum dispersal distance was 323 +/- 212 km fo r males and 123 +/- 67 km for females. Of 10 new wolf territories where bre eding occurred, only 1 bordered other, existing territories. The distance f rom newly established wolf pairs to the nearest existing packs was 119 +/- 73 km. Simulation of population growth based on known reproductions and mor talities showed a close similarity to the results from population censuses up to the mid-1990s. To what extent this population is genetically isolated is at present unclear.